"Ajen is an accountant who is down to earth and genuinely interested in their clients prospering."
"As a trusted advisor you guided our business back on course when the outlook was far from positive and we look forward to your continued assistance into the future"
"His attitude towards his work and my portfolio has been exemplary. He always finds time for me at short notice and is a benefit to all."
"Ajen always has a high standard of professional manner. He continued to give me good advice and is a reliable person, helpful in sorting out problems and finding solutions easily."
"Ajendra has made himself available sometimes even after normal business hours, to assist us with any questions we have, even when sometimes they may have seemed silly or simple, he has answered in full and easy to understand terminology, at no point has he ever made me feel silly for asking."
"He is always accessible to speak with and even calls me to ask if I need help with anything."
"Ajendra's willingness to dedicate "caring time" to his clients sets him apart from others."
"I am confident to refer friends and family to his team because I know they are in the most capable hands. Ajendra’s honest, caring and upbeat nature has been an absolute godsend and I am so thankful that our paths crossed"
"Ajendra’s speaks with you in a language that you can understand and comprehend easily which assists in equity and partnership with your tax agent."
"We find you have a personal approach to your accounting practice, which makes everyone feel like number 1. This is a rare and special trait, and leaves us knowing we are in good hands."
"He is very astute, and at the same time down to earth and really interested in his clients prospering. For people like us who are new to small business this is an absolute god sent."
"He shows a genuine interest and I never feel rushed. He has created a warm and friendly environement."

WHS and OHS Regulatory Update: August 2025

Officers have an ongoing duty to ensure their organisations remain compliant and stay informed about work health and safety matters. This update covers recent developments to help officers meet their obligations and stay current with WHS changes.

.

In Short

  • New NSW workplace safety reforms introduce mandatory Codes of Practice, greater enforcement powers, and new reporting requirements for improvement notices.

  • As of 1 August 2025, Queensland inspectors will conduct audits on buildings constructed before 1990 to ensure proper asbestos risk management.

  • A serious workplace fall resulted in fines totalling $795,000, highlighting the need for effective training, incident reporting, and adherence to safety codes.

Tips for Businesses
Review and update your safety systems to align with the new NSW Codes of Practice and reporting duties. If operating in older Queensland buildings, complete asbestos risk assessments and control measures. Reinforce training on equipment use and incident reporting to prevent serious injuries and avoid large fines.

Legislative Update

The NSW Government has recently passed reforms that will see significant changes to the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) and the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). 

The key changes seek to establish new processes for addressing bullying and harassment in the workplace while strengthening existing WHS provisions and enforcement practices. 

Some of the key amendments include: 

  1. implementing mandatory Codes of Practice employers will be required to adhere to;
  2. new enforcement powers for SafeWork NSW to enforce compliance and improve information sharing across different jurisdictions; and
  3. reporting obligations for employers to report improvement notices issued by health and safety representatives to SafeWork NSW. 

We will continue to monitor and report on this matter (including when the changes will come into effect). 

Asbestos Management Compliance Audits in Queensland

From 1 August 2025, Workplace Health and Safety Queensland inspectors have commenced auditing businesses operating from buildings constructed before 1990 and those likely to contain asbestos. 

Focus on Physical Risks to Safety 

A series of serious workplace incidents involving machinery and equipment highlights critical gaps in safety protocols across many organisations. These cases demonstrate that regardless of the type of business, employers can benefit from implementing robust safety mechanisms and reviewing inadequate work processes.

The incidents revealed recurring issues such as: 

  1. insufficient worker training for equipment operation and maintenance tasks;
  2. poor incident reporting practices, with some businesses failing to report serious injuries; and 
  3. repeat offences indicating systemic safety culture problems.

The consequences of non-compliance have led to employers facing substantial fines of up to $90,000. 

The overarching message is clear: all organisations can learn from implementing safer mechanisms for workers operating any kind of equipment. Where processes have not been established to carry out work safely, they should be reviewed and implemented.

These cases serve as important reminders that proactive safety measures, proper training, and robust reporting systems are essential across all workplaces to prevent serious injuries.

Cases and Incidents

A worker suffered serious injuries after falling 2.2 metres. The incident resulted in both the business and the company director receiving significant fines.

1. What Happened?

The worker suffered multiple injuries and has ongoing health issues as a result of the fall. The employer had implemented a safety management plan that had assessed the risk of falls from such a height as a moderate risk. While the employer had identified the risk within their safety management plan, they did not put appropriate steps in place to effectively mitigate the risk. 

2. What Was the Outcome?

The employer faced a fine of $750,000. Additionally, the company director was personally fined $45,000. 

3. Key Takeaways

While safety management plans can be effective ways to identify and record risks to safety within the workplace, consideration should be given to effective management of the organisation’s risk exposure.

In this case, the employer had not taken into account the Code of Practice for the Prevention of Falls in Workplaces. WorkSafe Commissioner Sally North noted that the Code of Practice would have provided practical guidance to effectively manage fall risks and should be followed in all workplaces where risks of falls exist.

Employers should ensure that they are reviewing and implementing guidance from relevant Codes of Practice within the workplace to ensure effective risk management.

 

 

 

 

 

James True
August 15, 2025
legalvision.com.au

 

 

Want to know more?

Do you have a question about something you've read in this article? Need more information? Want to book an appointment? Simply let us know below and we'll get back to you ASAP.